Trump Chooses Vance as VP
Donald Trump selected J.D. Vance, the 39-year-old populist, as his vice-presidential pick, indicating his vision for the movement's future beyond his presidency. Vance's challenge is to solidify his MAGA credentials and appeal to both Trump supporters and skeptics, having previously criticized Trump. Known for his memoir Hillbilly Elegy, Vance is expected to articulate and refine Trump's economic populism, which focuses on the middle class and less on foreign alliances. Critics question if Vance or anyone else can match Trump's charisma and influence, but Vance does advocate for policies that support the working class, aligning with Trump's agenda. Vance is now seen as Trump's chosen successor for the MAGA movement and as a step towards continuing Trump's "America First" policies, with other young MAGA figures potentially rising in influence. The movement's focus on the middle and working classes is viewed as its enduring strength.
The indicators increasingly show that Trump will likely win the election in November, but there are issues that need to be overcome to solidify the movement. Even if Trump does win, he will constitutionally only be able to serve one more term. That means the MAGA movement will need to exist beyond Trump, and Vance’s choice shows that possibility as he is young and popular on the right. He could credibly become president in 2028 at only 44 years old in juxtaposition to the elderly Trump and Biden. Furthermore, Vance aligns significantly with the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, which is another example of how the political right in the United States will continue the MAGA movement after Trump’s possible presidency. What both analysts and corporations need to understand is that the Trumpism and the MAGA movement has become entrenched in the political right, and Vance’s choice as vice president will help make him the new standard bearer after Trump. This will alter long-term analysis of both public policy and political risks.
X Battling Regulations in Europe and California
The European Commission has formally notified Elon Musk's social media platform X of alleged breaches of the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA) and potential fines up to 6% of its global annual turnover. The Commission's preliminary findings suggest X engaged in deceptive practices, such as selling the "blue checkmark" verification in a misleading way, failing to ensure advertising transparency, and restricting researchers' access to public data. X has the opportunity to appeal these findings. Other platforms like TikTok and Meta are also under investigation for similar issues. While X can contest the findings and propose solutions, it is unclear what the final outcome or fine might be.
Besides battling the European Commission, X will be moving from California to Texas over socially left-wing policies implemented by the former. Although these might seem like unrelated issues, they demonstrate that American social media and technology companies will have to choose how to respond to regulations of all sorts. The balkanization of technology is becoming more of a reality, and it is credible that certain companies will abandon left-wing countries and regions that overly regulate economies and impose values that companies oppose. This separation between cultures will have negative impacts as it will likely harm trade and economic integration over the long term, both between regions and even within countries.
Policy Changes to AI if Trump Wins
Allies of former President Donald Trump have drafted an executive order focused on boosting military AI technology and reducing regulations on AI development. Titled "Make America First in AI," the plan includes multiple "Manhattan Projects" for military AI advancements and proposes reviewing and removing what it considers unnecessary regulations. This marks a stark contrast to the Biden administration’s approach, which emphasizes AI safety testing. The draft suggests creating industry-led agencies to oversee AI models and protect against foreign threats, benefiting tech companies like Palantir and Anduril. The conservative Heritage Foundation is also preparing its own AI policies for a potential second Trump term, aiming to enhance US AI research while limiting China’s access to the technology. Trump’s history with AI includes a 2020 executive order on AI use in federal agencies. The draft order, associated with the America First Policy Institute, reflects a potential shift in AI policy under a second Trump administration, aligned with the Republican Party’s 2024 platform. The political climate in Silicon Valley is also shifting, with some tech executives now supporting Trump. Trump’s nomination of Ohio Senator J.D. Vance as his 2024 running mate, will likely energize proponents of rapid AI development due to Vance’s tech ties and opposition to AI regulation.
US, Russia, and China Expanding Missile Production
Four decades ago, the US deployed nuclear missiles in Europe to counter Soviet SS-20s, leading to a disarmament deal in 1987 (INF Treaty). The treaty led to significant nuclear arms reductions. However, the US exited the treaty, accusing Russia of violations with its 9M729 missile. In response, Russia imposed a moratorium but recently decided to resume missile production after the US brought similar missiles to Europe and Asia. In June 2024, President Putin announced Russia would resume producing these missiles, and in July, the US announced plans to deploy similar weapons in Germany from 2026. The US is preparing for the longer-term stationing of advanced missiles in Europe, including SM-6, Tomahawk cruise missiles, and hypersonic weapons.
This renewal of the arms race, amid heightened tensions over Ukraine, involves not only the US and Russia but also China. This arms race could credibly lead to further military confrontations and complicate global security dynamics as historical examples strongly indicate this. In addition, making new arms control deals is extremely unlikely over the medium term because they would have to be trilateral in nature between the US, Russia, and China. Considering the major security issues in Europe and Asia, all great powers will seek greater offensive capabilities, which in turn will make conflict more likely between them.
Japan Likely to Let Businesses Fail to Improve Economy
Years of sluggish growth and population decline have left many of Japan's small and medium-sized firms reliant on state aid and low-interest funding. These businesses, which provide around 70% of jobs, are now facing challenges as pandemic support wanes and interest rates rise for the first time in 17 years. The Japanese government is shifting its approach, willing to let more underperforming companies fail to promote growth through mergers and acquisitions (M&A) rather than avoiding bankruptcies at the expense of productivity. This strategy aims to channel workers and investment into more productive companies, thereby boosting wages. However, this change faces obstacles, including the entrenched postwar social contract and the limited M&A skills among current small business owners. If Japan is able to implement these more capitalist policies, then it could turn their economy around over the medium term. The fundamental structural problems in Japan mean that the government cannot use the same policies as in the past, and the cultural dedication to stability over reform in the economy will have to change as well. Abe’s government previously attempted reforms, but Kishida’s government might be successful where Abe was not. Improved economic performance in Japan would help Western corporations in strategically important sectors as well.
Rwanda Reelects Kagame to Fourth Term
Rwandan President Paul Kagame has won a fourth term with 99% of the votes in a largely uncontested election. Importantly, with the constitutional changes Kagame could stay in power for another decade. Kagame, in power since 1994 after leading the Rwandan Patriotic Front to end the genocide, has consistently won elections with high margins amid criticisms of lacking real competition and disqualifying opponents. Despite significant economic progress under his rule, Kagame is seen as both a visionary leader and an authoritarian, with accusations of suppressing opposition and a lack of free press. Rwanda's involvement in regional conflicts, particularly in Congo, and allegations of supporting rebel groups add to the complexity of Kagame's leadership. Kagame’s reelection will likely provide internal stability in Rwanda as he remains popular for his infrastructure development, economic reforms, and reducing ethnic divisions. However, it threatens regional instability as his foreign policy continues to create consternation with neighbors, such as the DRC. What this means for regional politics is likely continuity, and corporations should not expect any major changes in policy.
UK Government Announces Policy Agenda
Britain's King Charles presented Prime Minister Keir Starmer's legislative agenda, emphasizing a government focused on reviving the economy, addressing the housing shortage, and tackling the cost of living crisis. The agenda includes over 35 bills aimed at economic growth, planning law reforms for easier home construction, and speeding up major infrastructure projects. Starmer, who won a significant parliamentary majority, acknowledges the challenges ahead, emphasizing patient, serious solutions. Key legislative points include streamlining planning processes, renationalizing the rail network, and resetting relations with the EU through a new security pact. Essentially, Labour seeks to undo many Conservative policies over the past forty years, bringing back socialism as the policy preference. When it comes to foreign policy, Starmer has promised to increase defense spending to 2.5% of GDP, but he has not established a timeline to do so. Prime Minister Starmer stated, “My government will forge a new clear-eyed approach to our national defenses, equipping us to tackle international threats head-on while keeping the British people safe and secure.” If Starmer is successful at increasing defense spending, then this will likely help bring stability to geopolitics as Britian will be able to support the US and NATO more effectively. Yet many European countries have failed to deliver on such promises. Significant tax increases would be needed, and Starmer would be less likely to implement expanded domestic programs.
Attempted Assassinations Highlight Threats to Public Figures
The attempted assassination of former President Trump on July 13 has highlighted the increasing problem of threats and violence against public figures. Only shortly before that assassination attempt the US and Germany thwarted an attempted assassination by Russia against the CEO of an arms manufacturer that supported Ukraine. Recent research by the Combatting Terrorism Center at West Point will help analysts contextualize this problem for their clients. The abstract of the research reads: “A review of federal charges for the past decade highlights that the number of threats to public officials is growing. While 2013-2016 had an average of 38 federal charges per year, that number sharply increased to an average of 62 charges per year between 2017-2022. Across the time series, ideologically motivated threats, on average, accounted for almost half of the cases, and the portion steadily increased year over year. A preliminary review of cases from 2023 and 2024 shows that the number of federal prosecutions is on pace to hit new record highs. The rising threat level may produce significant consequences for the U.S. democratic system of governance.”
If you enjoyed this newsletter why not sign up to receive it by email
We need your consent to load the translations
We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.